Hi,
An "object record" can be linked to multiple "media representations". (Also, we could have the same "media representation" linked with two differents objects.)
For example: a vintage computer (object) is illustrated by 5 photographies and 1 video (media representations). To be visible in the pawtucket part, my vintage computer had to be "accessible to public". But the photographies and video also have to be "accessible to public" if I want that everybody can see these medias.
Also, I could choose to put some photographies linked to an object that will not be "accessible to public", but only for restricted users, or just accessible for adminstrators/curators, and not for public people. For example: an "object record" of an artistic creation could be linked with some photographies including a scan of certificate of authenticity, but we could choose that the certificate is not public, only visible by curators.
That's why the visibility status of "media representations" are independent of the visibility status of objects. (And in a same manner, for "places", "entities" (people), "occurrences" (events), or other kind of records.)
In your specific case, you can consider that the physical "object" (an argentic photography) is the same thing that "media representation" (the image of that argentic photography). But you can consider that the physical object "argentic photography" could have two associated media representations: 1. the scan of the photography itself, 2. the scan of the back, where you could have some handwritten annotations.. why not!
Consider that a "media representation" can be an image, a video, a PDF document, or a sound... And this record can be linked to one or multiple objects records.